Virginia Court Upholds Infineon's Fraud and Punitive Damages Verdict And Awards Infineon $7.1 Million In Legal Expenses
Richmond, Va. August 10, 2001 Infineon Technologies (FSE/NYSE:IFX) today announced that Federal District Judge Robert E. Payne denied Rambus motion to set aside a jury verdict holding Rambus liable for fraud in connection with the SDRAM standardization process. The jury verdict was delivered on May 9, 2001 following a two-week trial in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Infineon filed counter-claims in that action alleging that Rambus subverted the SDRAM standardization process of the Joint Electronic Device Engineering Council (JEDEC) by failing to disclose patents and patent applications relevant to that JEDEC standard.
The Court found that in committing its fraud Rambus acted deliberately (pursuant to its Business Plan) and with callous disregard of its disclosure obligations and the rights of Infineon and other JEDEC members. The Court also noted that the fraud affected not just Infineon, but reached an entire segment of the semiconductor industry and many of its products. The Courts decision to uphold the jurys verdict confirms the importance of intellectual property disclosure during the industry-wide, open standard-setting process.
As a remedy for Rambus fraud, the Court issued an anti-suit injunction against Rambus. The injunction bars Rambus from asserting, against Infineons synchronous DRAMs that comply with JEDEC's SDRAM standard, any current or future U.S. patent directed to the technologies targeted by Rambus fraud. Although the Court also set aside part of the jurys fraud verdict that relates to DDR SDRAM, this decision does not affect Infineons ability to sell those products. Judge Payne previously dismissed all of Rambus patent infringement claims related to both Infineons SDRAM and DDR SDRAM products.
Judge Payne also awarded Infineon over $7.1 million in attorneys fees and expenses incurred in successfully defending against Rambus patent infringement claims and prosecuting Infineons fraud counter-claim. The Court based the award on a finding that Rambus patent infringement suit was baseless, unjustified and frivolous, the seriousness of Rambus fraud perpetrated against Infineon and other members of JEDEC, and Rambus conduct during the litigation which included misleading testimony by Rambus executives and destruction of documents.
Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany, offers semiconductor and system solutions for applications in the wired and wireless communications markets, for security systems and smartcards, for the automotive and industrial sectors, as well as memory products. With a global presence, Infineon operates in the US from San Jose, CA, in the Asia-Pacific region from Singapore and in Japan from Tokyo. In the fiscal year 2000 (ending September), the company achieved sales of Euro 7.28 billion with about 29,000 employees worldwide. Infineon is listed on the DAX index of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol: IFX). Further information is available at www.infineon.com
The Court found that in committing its fraud Rambus acted deliberately (pursuant to its Business Plan) and with callous disregard of its disclosure obligations and the rights of Infineon and other JEDEC members. The Court also noted that the fraud affected not just Infineon, but reached an entire segment of the semiconductor industry and many of its products. The Courts decision to uphold the jurys verdict confirms the importance of intellectual property disclosure during the industry-wide, open standard-setting process.
As a remedy for Rambus fraud, the Court issued an anti-suit injunction against Rambus. The injunction bars Rambus from asserting, against Infineons synchronous DRAMs that comply with JEDEC's SDRAM standard, any current or future U.S. patent directed to the technologies targeted by Rambus fraud. Although the Court also set aside part of the jurys fraud verdict that relates to DDR SDRAM, this decision does not affect Infineons ability to sell those products. Judge Payne previously dismissed all of Rambus patent infringement claims related to both Infineons SDRAM and DDR SDRAM products.
Judge Payne also awarded Infineon over $7.1 million in attorneys fees and expenses incurred in successfully defending against Rambus patent infringement claims and prosecuting Infineons fraud counter-claim. The Court based the award on a finding that Rambus patent infringement suit was baseless, unjustified and frivolous, the seriousness of Rambus fraud perpetrated against Infineon and other members of JEDEC, and Rambus conduct during the litigation which included misleading testimony by Rambus executives and destruction of documents.
About Infineon Technologies
Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany, offers semiconductor and system solutions for applications in the wired and wireless communications markets, for security systems and smartcards, for the automotive and industrial sectors, as well as memory products. With a global presence, Infineon operates in the US from San Jose, CA, in the Asia-Pacific region from Singapore and in Japan from Tokyo. In the fiscal year 2000 (ending September), the company achieved sales of Euro 7.28 billion with about 29,000 employees worldwide. Infineon is listed on the DAX index of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker symbol: IFX). Further information is available at www.infineon.com
Informationsnummer
INFXX200108.112e